Never before has American acim app been in as precarious a situation as it seems to be at present. For over ten years now we have seen many governors’ summits, and a host of commissions, committees, panels, unions, boards and business executives trying to warn citizens that American schools have become dysfunctional and are in dire need of repairs. And for over ten years the results of student performance have worsened despite the billions being spent to stop the downward trend. Perhaps the time has come to stop and try to examine the problem rationally.
It is not the first time that American education has reach a threshold at which only radical solutions seem to be call for. This time, however, reformers are calling for a systemic reform, a complete rethinking of the very concept of education. As politicians, educators, academicians, psychologists, sociologists, and CEOs entered the fray, the well-intentioned movement became murky and increasingly chaotic. It soon became clear that the reformers truly intended a clean sweep of what education had meant to Americans.
The acquisition of knowledge for its own sake, the study and appreciation of great works by outstanding minds and artists, the acquisition of communication and mathematical skills, the objective search for scientific knowledge, the analysis and assimilation of ideas and ideals that enabled western civilization to serve as a beacon for the rest of the world, all of this was suddenly declare superficial, politically motivated, artificial, and unneed. The new education was to turn from such academic trivia to preparing the new person for the 21st century, a person aware of the leading role that was to be play by the new technology which in some way will take care of all the other academic “frills” that had mark the progress of the old education, the acim app of the past.
The search for truth, which was at the heart of the traditional academy, was to be replace by the promotion of the social and emotional growth of the individual while preparing him or her for the demands of the “real life.” As a result, a bevy of researchers and educators started scurrying around for a system that would accomplish this.
A goldmine seem to be struck when a group of sociologists and educators. With the assistance of politicians and business executives, came across a program. That had been around for some time and that had close connections with Dewey’s “progressive education.” Known as Outcome Based Education, it called for a much greater emphasis. The affective dimension of the acim app process at the expense of the old academic rigors. Basing itself on the conviction that it’s a disproven theory that children must first learn basic skills. Before engaging in more complex tasks, the stress was now to be place on the “more complex tasks.”
The educational process was to move from concepts to facts rather than vice versa. This called for a complete revamping of teaching methods. Instead of the teacher being an authoritative figure in the front of the class. He was to be a “coach” helping the class to knowledge in small groups working on one or more projects. Working together in groups would prepare students for the team approach used by industry. It would also “level the playing field” so that the disadvantaged would have the same opportunity as others in the learning process. This brings us to the two dominant mantras of the new acim app.
One is that it must foster self-esteem; the other that “it takes a whole village to raise a child.” The first requires that students must acquire the attitudes, values. And feelings that would lead to a smooth, painless transition to the “real life,” as defined by experts. The second requires that the child’s entire community participate in defining his or her education. As for assessing the results, standardized tests are out for the most part. Whatever testing is done must be supplement by portfolio containing. A student’s work record that follows him or her throughout his or her schooling and beyond. In short, primary emphasis is place. The student’s ability to process information rather than to acquire and to retain knowledge of content material or a discipline.